Posted: 03/31/09 18:30, Edited: 04/01/09 02:14
by Dave Mindeman
The 3 judges overseeing the US Senate election contest are some tough cookies. Frankly, their ruling took Coleman and pummeled him like a punching bag.
The Judges came out swinging:
Contestants' counsel argued that the Court should presume a voter is registered without evidence to the contrary, that a witness with a Minnesota address is properly registered, that a voter with an absentee ballot completed an absentee ballot application, and that the voter's signature is genuine. However, when the counties or a party places an absentee ballot in issue and that ballot has been carefully reviewed but continues to lack legally sufficiency, the Court can make no such presumption.
Ouch...a left jab to the head.
"Furthur, Contestants' presumptions are not reasonable in light of the small number of absentee ballots at issue in this election contest and the fact that these absentee ballots have already been carefully reviewed as many as three times by state and local election officials.
Oomph...a right cross to the jaw.
An unregistered voter may not cast a ballot even if the voter's failure to register to vote is the result of election official errors or omissions regarding registration.
Ooooo...a direct blow to the breadbasket.
The court isn't buying the arguments. The universe of absentee ballots yet to be counted has been narrowed to 400.
And 50% of them come from St. Louis, Ramsey, and Hennepin counties.
Coleman is teetering.

We may be on the verge of a technical knockout.



